Archive Abortion

Abortion As ‘The Lesser Evil”

A few days later, I still cannot believe what I read last week. Columnist Antonia Senior wrote a piece for The Times of London in favor of killing human beings in order to further the Feminist cause. I am not kidding. This is what she wrote. You might think it a joke or a hoax, but it’s not. The article appeared in a column in a major newspaper and is meant to be taken seriously.

Here’s a thumbnail sketch of her argument. As a pro-choice feminist, Senior says she had always believed that an unborn child was not a life but a potential life. That was her belief until she finally had her own child. After giving birth to her own little girl, her view of the personhood of the unborn changed. In her own words:

“What seems increasingly clear to me is that, in the absence of an objective definition, a foetus is a life by any subjective measure. My daughter was formed at conception, and all the barely understood alchemy that turned the happy accident of that particular sperm meeting that particular egg into my darling, personality-packed toddler took place at that moment. She is so unmistakably herself, her own person — forged in my womb, not by my mothering.

“Any other conclusion is a convenient lie that we on the pro-choice side of the debate tell ourselves to make us feel better about the action of taking a life. That little seahorse shape floating in a willing womb is a growing miracle of life. In a resentful womb it is not a life, but a foetus — and thus killable.”

Astonishingly, even though she concedes that an unborn baby is a human life, she says that killing a baby is sometimes the lesser of two evils. Feminism’s commitment to reproductive freedom and “fertility control” is more important than an unborn baby’s life. It would be more evil to surrender Feminism than to kill a human life. In her own words:

“The answer lies in choosing the lesser evil. The nearly 200,000 aborted babies in the UK each year are the lesser evil, no matter how you define life, or death, for that matter. If you are willing to die for a cause, you must be prepared to kill for it, too.”

If you don’t think that this is the logical consequence of 3rd wave Feminist ideology, then you don’t understand Feminism. Such Feminists on both sides of the pond believe that a woman’s “right to choose” is more important than another person’s right to life. This is the logic of death, and it is why over 50 million unborn humans have been legally killed in America since 1973.

Columnist Antonia Senior concedes that an unborn baby at any stage of development is a human life in her article “Yes, Abortion is Killing. But it’s the Lesser Evil” that appeared in the June 30, 2010 edition of The Times (London). But she then continues to contend that feminism is more important than life, and that, when necessary, women must be willing to kill for the feminist cause even as they are willing to die for it.

You can download and read Senior’s article here.

Dr. Albert Mohler, President of Southern Baptist Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, addressed this article in his Thursday, July 1, 2010 blog. Please take a few moments to read his blog post. You can read it here.

Photo

pastor

July 6th

Abortion

Culture

Feminism

Is It Moral To Pay Taxes In Light Of Obamacare?

Cyndi and I are in Lynchburg, Virginia awaiting the arrival of our first grandson, Micah James. Last night I received an email from a friend asking me about the morality of paying taxes to the United States Government in light of the new healthcare law which provides federal subsidies for abortion.

Dr. Albert Mohler addressed that question yesterday in an extended essay on his website. I commended it to my friend and I commend it to you.
Mohler builds on two New Testament texts in particular that I think are important: Romans 13:1-7 and 1 Peter 2:13-17. Mohler rightly identifies the governing authority during Paul’s and Peter’s time as the Roman Empire. Both texts command Christians to subject themselves to governing authorities, and Romans 13:7 specifically commands Christians to pay their taxes: “Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.”
I would add one additional observation. When Paul wrote Romans, it was near the beginning of Emperor Nero’s reign (mid-50’s A.D.), and this was before there was any major state-sanctioned persecution of Christians. When Peter wrote 1 Peter, it was near the end of Nero’s reign (around 64 A.D. if you take the traditional dating), and it is clear that the recipients of 1 Peter were undergoing persecution (1 Peter 1:6; 4:12). Thus, the command to obey governing authorities applies even in times of persecution—when Christians are being put to death unjustly.
So is there ever a time for civil disobedience? Yes, there is. The prime apostolic example of this is recorded in the book of
Acts. When the authorities prohibited Peter and the apostles from preaching the gospel, Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). I think the principle is clear. Human governments get their authority from God, and they cannot bind the conscience to disobey God. When a government commands something that God forbids or forbids something that God commands, Christians must obey God rather than government. In such cases, they must be willing to disobey even if doing so brings a painful consequence (1 Peter 2:20; 3:14, 17). It seems clear, however, that the apostles didn’t include paying taxes to an immoral regime as an occasion for civil disobedience.

Abortion Coverage Is In Healthcare Reform

In today’s Washington Post Michael Gerson writes on the Healthcare Bill making its way through the House:

“Those who support the Senate bill are participating in what is effectively the largest expansion of federal involvement in abortion since the Hyde Amendment limited that role in 1976.”

Gerson is spot on with this statement. However, there are some who are claiming that the Senate bill doesn’t cover abortions.

Ruth Marcus, for instance, argues that abortions will decrease under the Senate Bill and that there isn’t that much difference between the House and Senate bills. But here’s a question she cannot answer with credibility. If there isn’t very much difference, then why is the pro-abortion lobby (Planned Parenthood, NOW, etc.) moving heaven and earth to keep the Senate Bill as is without the Stupak restrictions on abortion?

Here’s the bottom line. The American people overwhelmingly oppose tax-payer funded abortions. Therefore, supporters of this bill are doing everything they can to conceal the fact that it funds abortions. Don’t be deceived.

If you haven’t called your representative yet, call now and tell him/her to oppose this bill.

Photo

pastor

March 18th

Abortion

Political
line
September 2010
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930